The new Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that just became law was the
biggest change to the US Tax system in 32 years. One of the aspects of the law
was the new limitation of real estate taxes and the State and Local Tax (SALT)
deduction to $10,000. This affects many taxpayers in high tax states like New
York and California who pay a lot more than $10,000. Because of the new law,
they will not be able to take that deduction over $10,000.
The high tax states have been busy coming up with new ways
to try and get around the law. In New York, there are two proposals Governor
Cuomo has floated to address ways to get around the SALT limitation.
The first would be to create a non-profit which would fund
government operations. Donations to this non-profit would be used as a credit
against state and local taxes on the New York State tax return. There is no
limitation on charitable deductions in the new tax law. So donations to this
new charity would be 100% deductible on your federal return. There is one
problem. The IRS defines a charitable contribution as a “donation or gift to,
or for the use of, a qualified organization. It is voluntary and is made without getting, or expecting to get,
anything of equal value.” One could argue that the tax credit gained from
the donation to the state charity is equivalent to getting something of equal
value. Ultimately, it will be the US
Treasury Department’s decision whether to recognize these donations as true
charitable contributions. The most likely scenario is that it will not. The
point of restricting the SALT and real estate tax deduction to $10,000 was to
raise revenue. The Treasury Department is most likely not going to allow a plan
devised by the states to get around the rule.
The second proposal would give employers an option to issue
a payroll tax on employers for wages in excess of $40,000. If employers opt
into paying this payroll tax, they would lower the gross salaries of their
employees which would cause their federal and state income tax burdens to
decrease. In addition, the employee would be able to use this payroll tax as a
credit against their NYS income tax. The plan would be revenue neutral to the
state because the increase in the payroll tax would be countered by the
decrease in NYS income tax liability. With a change in withholdings, the
employee would not see a change in take-home pay.
Although the second proposal may seem more likely to pass
muster with the federal government, the republican majority in the State Senate
has already come out strongly against it based on the belief that the program
will not be as voluntary as the governor claims.
The fiscal year for New York State begins on April 1st.
It is doubtful that even if one of these proposals got bipartisan support, it
would pass by then.